Kamal hasan! You as deceptive intellectual deserve bankruptcy ON THIS EARTH IN 2013 A.D.Be brave! Don't cry in public as govt.believes that criminals weep in court to evade law. LAW MEANS TRUTHFUL MIND.
Kamal hasan is deceptive intellectual.
Deceptive intellectual versions have no place in india(social) now.
MY FACTS ON "VISWAROOPAM" BAN DISPUTE:
1).FILMS 'USED' TO DO BUSINESS ON PUBLIC-DISPUTE POINT/S.
2)."VISWAROOPAM" MORAL-LEGAL POINT IS BY "SAME KAMAL HASAN" MONEY(voice) AND "SAME KAMAL HASAN" NARRATION(sense) WHICH IS CAUSING SOCIAL-OBJECTION FOR PRE-EMPTIVE INTERVENTION BY GOVT.
3).KAMAL HASAN ARGUMENT THAT 'SCRIPT-POINT IS BASED ON AFGHANISTAN MUSLIMS EXTREMISM AND SCRIPT-POINT HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH INDIAN(social) MUSLIMS" IS UNTENABLE AS INDIAN NATIONAL CHARACTER INCLUDES AFGHANISTAN NATIONAL CHARACTER.SO 'VISWAROOPAM' DEFINITELY CAUSES DISHARMONY BETWEEN TWO MAIN RELIGIONS IF FILM DOESN'T INCLUDE CUTS AND CHANGES.
4).ABOUT KAMAL HASAN SELF-FEELING THAT HE IS BEING FORCED TO LEAVE INDIA OR HE HIMSELF IS WILLING TO LEAVE INDIA FOR ANOTHER SECULAR STATE IN WORLD,IT IS HIS MANAGERIAL PROBLEM BUT NOT SOCIAL PROBLEM.
5).ABOUT KAMAL HASAN BANKRUPTCY FEAR/S IF "VISWAROOPAM" FILM IS NOT RELEASED,AGAIN IT IS HIS BUSINESS RISK BUT NOT SOCIAL RISK.
For ex.,If the film makes profit,can kamal hasan be ready to share profit/pay dividend with society.Present kamal hasan state of mind in social must be eye-opener to other big-budget film-producers who BELIEVE IN EXAGGERATION.
6).Any public explanation has limit of Rs.10 cr.
Like any public instruction has limit.
Like any public examination has limit.
7).About personal media support to film maker kamal hasan,personal media showed itself to society that it is diabolical(extreme-extreme) criminal without dualism.
FINALLY MY GIST IS THAT
1).THERE SHOULD NOT BE PERENNIAL AND INCONSISTENT OPPOSITION TO GOVT.
2).GOVT.POSITION MAY BE SOMETIMES UNTRUE BUT NOT ALWAYS.
Thank you! Kamal hasan! Don't make public nuisance!
Deception and pseudoism have no takers in digital social-system now.
Deceptive intellectual versions have no place in india(social) now.
MY FACTS ON "VISWAROOPAM" BAN DISPUTE:
1).FILMS 'USED' TO DO BUSINESS ON PUBLIC-DISPUTE POINT/S.
2)."VISWAROOPAM" MORAL-LEGAL POINT IS BY "SAME KAMAL HASAN" MONEY(voice) AND "SAME KAMAL HASAN" NARRATION(sense) WHICH IS CAUSING SOCIAL-OBJECTION FOR PRE-EMPTIVE INTERVENTION BY GOVT.
3).KAMAL HASAN ARGUMENT THAT 'SCRIPT-POINT IS BASED ON AFGHANISTAN MUSLIMS EXTREMISM AND SCRIPT-POINT HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH INDIAN(social) MUSLIMS" IS UNTENABLE AS INDIAN NATIONAL CHARACTER INCLUDES AFGHANISTAN NATIONAL CHARACTER.SO 'VISWAROOPAM' DEFINITELY CAUSES DISHARMONY BETWEEN TWO MAIN RELIGIONS IF FILM DOESN'T INCLUDE CUTS AND CHANGES.
4).ABOUT KAMAL HASAN SELF-FEELING THAT HE IS BEING FORCED TO LEAVE INDIA OR HE HIMSELF IS WILLING TO LEAVE INDIA FOR ANOTHER SECULAR STATE IN WORLD,IT IS HIS MANAGERIAL PROBLEM BUT NOT SOCIAL PROBLEM.
5).ABOUT KAMAL HASAN BANKRUPTCY FEAR/S IF "VISWAROOPAM" FILM IS NOT RELEASED,AGAIN IT IS HIS BUSINESS RISK BUT NOT SOCIAL RISK.
For ex.,If the film makes profit,can kamal hasan be ready to share profit/pay dividend with society.Present kamal hasan state of mind in social must be eye-opener to other big-budget film-producers who BELIEVE IN EXAGGERATION.
6).Any public explanation has limit of Rs.10 cr.
Like any public instruction has limit.
Like any public examination has limit.
7).About personal media support to film maker kamal hasan,personal media showed itself to society that it is diabolical(extreme-extreme) criminal without dualism.
FINALLY MY GIST IS THAT
1).THERE SHOULD NOT BE PERENNIAL AND INCONSISTENT OPPOSITION TO GOVT.
2).GOVT.POSITION MAY BE SOMETIMES UNTRUE BUT NOT ALWAYS.
Thank you! Kamal hasan! Don't make public nuisance!
Deception and pseudoism have no takers in digital social-system now.
Comments